LEGAL CASES & RESULTS

Criminal Law & Traffic Law Perth & Regional WA –

as of September 2017


Kimberley Man Acquitted

 My client was acquitted of twenty two counts of unlawful use of a computer system, the Police failing to establish unlawful access to any computer occurred and the case being thrown out on a no case to answer submission at the end of the prosecution case. His employment was preserved.

Max Crispe – Lawyer Regional WA

Mullaloo Man Challenges Speed Laser

We successfully challenged the LTI ultralite L20-20 laser speed gun. The allegation was that detection was at over 350m. The gun was unsupported by tripod with officer leaning over signal box. The effect of heart beat and breathing of officer affecting the laser beam at long distance, wrong car detected.

Perth Traffic Offences – Max Crispe

Ballajura Man Facing Third Reckless Driving Based on Radar Detection

Identification was a key issue. The charge was dropped after negotiations prior to trial. The client was entitled to recovery of all towage and vehicle storage fees as well as keeping his licence.

Max Crispe – Perth Traffic lawyer

East Perth man charged with assault occasioning bodily harm

The issue was self-defence – charge dropped after negotiation just prior to trial – client able to continue application for Australian citizenship with a clear record.

Max Crispe – Perth Criminal Lawyer

Perth Man charged with Reckless Driving

Zigzag scenic drive, driving wrong way on one way road at speed – accident – car written off. Reckless driving reduced to dangerous driving after negotiation on day of trial. Recovered costs and no licence suspension.

Max Crispe – Perth Traffic Lawyer

Jandakot man charged with driving under demerit point suspension facing loss of driver’s licence for nine months.

The issue at trial was the service of the notice of the demerit point suspension collected at a post office in a sealed envelope. The Police say that is service of the notice. The Police could not establish at trial what was in the envelope. The Court found him not guilty and costs.

Max Crispe – Traffic Lawyer Perth

Indecent Dealing of a Child

A man from South West in WA facing Indecent Dealing charges and trial in the Perth District Court. Case dropped by the DPP and matter at an end after consideration of our cross examination of the child.

Max Crispe – Perth & South West WA Criminal Lawyer

Mandurah Public Servant charged with 43 counts of unlawful access of a restricted computer system

Pleads guilty and fined $4,000 and granted an immediate spent conviction. A great result to have so many offences but end up with no conviction recorded on their criminal record.

Max Crispe – Mandurah & Perth Criminal Lawyer

Bunbury Man Charged with Reckless Driving

Matter listed for trial on plea of not guilty. Negotiation on the day prior to trial commencing, the charge reduced to careless driving. End result $200 fine and we recovered a costs award of $3200 for the client. No effect on his driver’s licence.

Max Crispe – Bunbury & Perth Traffic Lawyer

Wilson Man charged with reckless driving

Police alleged 121km/h in a 50km/h zone on the basis that Police maintained a constant 50 metre distance to ascertain speed. We used the Police dash cam to dispute Police claim. Charge downgraded to careless driving. Small fine, no licence suspension and full recovery of towage and impoundment costs.

Max Crispe – Traffic Lawyer – Perth & Regional WA

Sorrento man found not guilty after a Supreme Court jury trial on offence of arson

A serious allegation involving destruction of a house and the contents to the value of $340,000. Key issue in trial was identification. At the end of the trial the jury returned a unanimous verdict of not guilty and were clearly not satisfied our client was involved.

Max Crispe – Supreme Court Lawyer

Spearwood Man Charged with Indecent Dealing with a Child under 13 years

Trial took place in February 2016. Jury returned unanimous verdict of not guilty.

Max Crispe – Perth Trial Lawyer

Sale of prohibited drugs charge

Southern Suburbs Couple – Police seized cash of $71,819 as being reasonably suspected of being unlawfully obtained. It was suspected to be the result of sale of prohibited drugs. After negotiations with Police, $51,819 was returned to the clients.

Max Crispe & Team – Drug Charge Representation

DNA Acquittal

Albany client acquitted by Jury after a challenge to police regarding the origin of the DNA on a drug packet and money. See article at foot of page for more information.

Max Crispe – DNA Evidence Lawyer

Assault Public Officer Under Prescribed Circumstances

This is a matter that would require an immediate term of imprisonment of not less than six months. We were able to negotiate and have the prescribed circumstances removed for a client in Karratha. The client was fined.

Max Crispe & Team – Regional WA Criminal Lawyers

Reckless Driving

This matter was set for a trial in Karratha. Negotiated with Police and matter reduced down to dangerous driving and no loss of driver’s licence.

Max Crispe – Criminal lawyers servicing Karratha WA

Accessed a Restricted Computer System
Section 440A The Criminal Code

Our firm has acted successfully in a number of these matters acting for clients.

We did a trial in Derby Magistrates Court where the client was found not guilty. We also acted for a client in the Kalgoorlie Magistrates Court. The case collapsed on the first day and the client was acquitted.

We have also appeared in situations where clients have admitted the offence and pleaded guilty. We have successfully obtained a spent conviction so the person ended up with no record.

We also acted for a school teacher in a four day trial involving nine charges. This was in the Joondalup Magistrates Court. These were serious allegations. If convicted, he would have lost his employment. We raised a ‘No Case’ submission at the end of the Prosecution case. That was successful and the decision was given on the fourth day. The client was acquitted and the Prosecution was ordered to pay our legal costs.

We are always available for a consultation on these computer & IT law matters.

Max Crispe – Computer & IT Law Representation


Interesting Cases

DNA Acquittal

This was a jury trial in May 2016 in Albany and was determined on the issue of DNA.


The key question was not “Whose DNA it was?”. It was clearly the client’s. The question for the jury was “How did the DNA get there?”.

The case concerned 30g of high grade Methylamphetamine. The key issue was the client’s knowledge of the existence of the drugs and money hidden in the centre console of the car. Knowledge of the drugs is required to establish the accused is in possession of the drugs. The client denied all knowledge of the hidden drugs and money.

This case involved the challenge to Police evidence as to how the DNA got onto the drug packet and money hidden in the centre console of the car.

DNA is mobile and secondary transfer can and does occur. Secondary transfer DNA can occur by a handshake. Person A shakes the hand of person B and person B then for example touches an object, eg. a glass and can leave only the DNA of person A. Person A never physically ever touched the glass.

Likewise, an object, in this case the top section of the console placed on the seat from the centre console during the search and where the client had previously been seated may collect the client’s DNA. If the lid, as in this case, was then placed back on top of the console at some stage during the search which it was, where the drugs and cash were, it could deposit the client’s DNA on the drugs and cash.

The central question, therefore, is if the DNA on the drugs and money came from primary contact by the client with the drugs and money, he must have had knowledge of their existence in the hidden centre console. If there was a doubt as to whether it was primary contact or if it could have been from a secondary transfer, that would not be consistent with the DNA being placed by him directly.

This case resulted in a jury acquittal.

If you are interested in the concept of secondary DNA and its application to the Criminal Justice system, it is worthwhile reading this rather short full Court decision of the High Court – Fitzgerald v The Queen [2014] HCA 28.